You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Using angle brackets for one (probably type params, as that's more common so users will be familiar with it) makes sense, but we need to use a different syntax, or maybe just methods, for left and right shifts, to avoid the lexing and syntax highlighting issues with >> and <<s.
Currently we use brackets for both type arguments and variants, which cause nested brackets. From the tests in
tests/Rows3.fir
:Using angle brackets for one (probably type params, as that's more common so users will be familiar with it) makes sense, but we need to use a different syntax, or maybe just methods, for left and right shifts, to avoid the lexing and syntax highlighting issues with
>>
and<<
s.If we use angle brackets for type parameters:
If we use angle brackets for variants:
Using braces is not an option, as we'll use braces for indentation insensitive syntax.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: