Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explore "approximate" gradients #4

Open
WardLT opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Explore "approximate" gradients #4

WardLT opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
Gordon-Bell Tasks focused for scaling up

Comments

@WardLT
Copy link
Collaborator

WardLT commented Dec 14, 2022

We cannot get gradients with MP2 in NWChemEx (yet!) and they are additional expense anyway.

What happens if we train without gradients or using numerical approximations of 1 or more directions?

@WardLT WardLT added the Gordon-Bell Tasks focused for scaling up label Dec 14, 2022
@WardLT
Copy link
Collaborator Author

WardLT commented Dec 14, 2022

Update from SPEC (excited states):

  • CC has 95% complete gradients (missing just one term). Are they "close enough" to be useful?
    • They have it for "singles and doubles," which is generally accepted to be better than MP2
    • Not yet sure what the timeline for it is (check in with them in mid/late-Jan about it)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Gordon-Bell Tasks focused for scaling up
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant