Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question regarding matching CoNLL output with NER tags containing B-ORG GPE #26

Open
obkhan opened this issue Apr 21, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@obkhan
Copy link

obkhan commented Apr 21, 2022

Hi,

I have been successfully able to extract entities into CoNLL-RDF into a NER annotation for a Word class.

See below for the source CoNLL-RDF:
acoli-repo/conll-rdf#84 (comment)

And created resulting ttl:
Source:
https://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/coronavirus/economic_impact_covid-19_11-10-21
How Charlotte’s Banks Responded to COVID-19
By Elizabeth Medlin - The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (
Views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of their respective Reserve Banks or the Federal Reserve System.)

economic_impact_covid_ner.ttl.zip

But would like to match this output to an ontology - in particular the NER annotations , I'm not having a lot of luck doing so. I thinks some of it has to do with my source ttl and I'm missing some necessary steps?

Any suggestions in what I could try with LogMap? I would be glad to try to clarify if I'm not asking the right question.

@obkhan obkhan changed the title question regarding matching CoNLL output with NER tags containing I-ORG GPE question regarding matching CoNLL output with NER tags containing B-ORG GPE Apr 21, 2022
@ernestojimenezruiz
Copy link
Owner

Hi

LogMap relies on the OWL API to load the input ontologies. A problem may also be if the ttl data file lacks information/definitions about the TBOX (e.g. concepts and properties). Which is the problem you are encountering?

Ernesto

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants