Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Serverless]: Authentication realms will be supported at the platform level, not project level #234

Closed
ppf2 opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@ppf2
Copy link
Member

ppf2 commented Dec 6, 2024

Serverless Docs

Elasticsearch

Description

Elasticsearch Serverless documentation indicates that authentication realms is a planned feature at the Elasticsearch project level but this is not the case.

Security realms like SAML, OIDC is going to be supported (currently in preview) at the platform level (not at the project level) via the bring-your-own-IDP feature.

We should clarify this accordingly.

Resources and additional context

https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/serverless/current/elasticsearch-differences.html#elasticsearch-differences-serverless-feature-planned

@alxchalkias
Copy link
Contributor

Correction, BYOIdP currently only supports SAML, not OIDC.

@jakommo
Copy link
Contributor

jakommo commented Dec 10, 2024

I wonder if the planed features section should just link to https://www.elastic.co/cloud/serverless/roadmap, rather than listing things in two places. Or is the roadmap more high level / less detailed?

@ppf2
Copy link
Member Author

ppf2 commented Dec 10, 2024

Also linking the separate doc request that recommends linking to the roadmap page from our various limitations and "Serverless differences" pages. In general, how we represent limitations across project types and platform are quite fragmented today ...

@ppf2
Copy link
Member Author

ppf2 commented Dec 30, 2024

Resolved by #248. Thanks @bytebilly !

@ppf2 ppf2 closed this as completed Dec 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants