Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failed to migrate dataset from prod to int instance #631

Closed
amaltaro opened this issue Apr 3, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Failed to migrate dataset from prod to int instance #631

amaltaro opened this issue Apr 3, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@amaltaro
Copy link
Contributor

amaltaro commented Apr 3, 2020

Yuyi,

I was investigating why one of our WMCore testing templates was failing to go through, and I just noticed that the dataset from the production DBS instance has not been migrated to the int instance yet. Here is how I just checked:

>>> from dbs.apis.dbsClient import DbsApi
>>> dbsApi = DbsApi(url = 'https://cmsweb-testbed.cern.ch/dbs/int/global/DBSMigrate/')
>>> dbsUrl = 'https://cmsweb.cern.ch/dbs/prod/global/DBSReader'
>>> dataset = '/RelValZEE_14/CMSSW_11_1_0_pre4-110X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_v8-v1/GEN-SIM'
>>> 
>>> migrateArgs = {'migration_url': dbsUrl, 'migration_input': dataset}
>>> dbsApi.submitMigration(migrateArgs)
{'migration_details': {'migration_status': 9, 'create_by': 'amaltaro', 'migration_url': 'https://cmsweb.cern.ch/dbs/prod/global/DBSReader', 'last_modified_by': 'amaltaro', 'creation_date': 1585835516, 'retry_count': 3, 'migration_input': '/RelValZEE_14/CMSSW_11_1_0_pre4-110X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_v8-v1/GEN-SIM', 'migration_request_id': 210003, 'last_modification_date': 1585835945}, 'migration_report': 'REQUEST ALREADY QUEUED. Migration terminally failed. '}
>>> 

Could you please investigate what the issue is?

Can you please check whether any migration has actually worked since HG2002? I'm concerned with the removal of c-ares in this PR: cms-sw/cmsdist#5438

FYI: @todor-ivanov

@todor-ivanov
Copy link

Thanks for tagging me here @amaltaro

@yuyiguo
Copy link
Member

yuyiguo commented Apr 3, 2020

Let me check.
Crab had problem with migration from prod to phys03 because a new data tier introduced in prod, but not in phys03 yet.

@yuyiguo
Copy link
Member

yuyiguo commented Apr 3, 2020

Alan,
The problem was more complicated than I thought. I wrote to Kate and cc'd you.
Let's wait for Kate to correct the partition error, then I will migration the block.
Yuyi

@yuyiguo
Copy link
Member

yuyiguo commented Apr 4, 2020

The migration is done. Please check, Alan.
Let me know if any problems. Otherwise, Please close this tickent.

@amaltaro
Copy link
Contributor Author

amaltaro commented Apr 5, 2020

@amaltaro amaltaro closed this as completed Apr 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants