You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The CSL Type vocabulary is an odd one and conflates a lot of things and is not very descriptive - thus it's not a great "type" vocabulary to display to users.
However, metadata fatigue is real and nobody wants to hand-enter a model, a type, and a csl type.
Can we build in a way for the site designers to configure a mapping? Maybe as a submodule? So that you could say
'Book, Section': 'chapter',
'Conference Abstract': 'document',
'Invited Presentation': 'speech',
etc
where the keys are the values of the user-displayed type field, and the values are the CSL types.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The CSL Type vocabulary is an odd one and conflates a lot of things and is not very descriptive - thus it's not a great "type" vocabulary to display to users.
However, metadata fatigue is real and nobody wants to hand-enter a model, a type, and a csl type.
Can we build in a way for the site designers to configure a mapping? Maybe as a submodule? So that you could say
'Book, Section': 'chapter',
'Conference Abstract': 'document',
'Invited Presentation': 'speech',
etc
where the keys are the values of the user-displayed type field, and the values are the CSL types.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: