You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Logical use would dictate that not having access to a channel should mean that you don't have any means of interacting with the respective channel and there should be no way for you to change this.
As it stands bots can however set overwrites in channels they don't have VIEW_CHANNEL for, allowing malicious behavior by forcing access to channels they should be locked out from.
If I understand the "logical use" wrong feel free to correct me.
(i could not find a similar request in the repo, feel free to link and close should it exist)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I thought the question for implicit grant to be different enough from the explicit deny and thus must've missed nights comment, as well as kantenkugel's recap, which covers it all.
Thanks for pointing it out, will watch that thread closely 👍
Logical use would dictate that not having access to a channel should mean that you don't have any means of interacting with the respective channel and there should be no way for you to change this.
As it stands bots can however set overwrites in channels they don't have VIEW_CHANNEL for, allowing malicious behavior by forcing access to channels they should be locked out from.
If I understand the "logical use" wrong feel free to correct me.
(i could not find a similar request in the repo, feel free to link and close should it exist)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: