Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete Meaningless issues #2 #707

Open
CreeperIsASpy opened this issue Feb 23, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Delete Meaningless issues #2 #707

CreeperIsASpy opened this issue Feb 23, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@musvaage
Copy link

Items 1., 2., 4. and 5., appear to be spam.

Since your predecessor Issue on the similar subject a spam Label has been created for the repository.

Item 8. seems to be a question.

@CreeperIsASpy
Copy link
Author

Items 1., 2., 4. and 5., appear to be spam.

Since your predecessor Issue on the similar subject a spam Label has been created for the repository.

Item 8. seems to be a question.

In my opinion, item 8 is not a question, please look at the translation:

Has DeepSeek ***considered*** training a large model on Lojban, an artificial language that is very formal and has clear rules?

It's a suggestion instead of a question , although it has a question mark.
As for why I say that #664 is meanningless, because it's really impossible .


以我来看,第八个 issue 并不是问题,请看原文:

DeepSeek ***有考虑过***在逻辑语(Lojban)上训练大模型吗,这种人工语言非常的形式化,且规则明确。

这是一个建议而不是问题尽管它有个问号。
至于我为什么说 #664 无意义,因为他说的,我觉得,基本不可能实现。

@musvaage
Copy link

My comment wasn't regarding the title's wording.

The spam label seems relevant to several of the listed Issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants