Need small fix

[username1565]

Un-leasing, this is outgoing transfer, not incoming:

Just reverse this bracket quote.

[deemru]

This is a misunderstanding, the actual point is:

• < = incoming transaction
• > = outgoing transaction

If someone did unlease from a node, it is someone's action, not the node action, so it cannot be >.

Another way of thinking is to imagine whos signature on a transaction. If it is not you then it is always incoming '<' transaction.

[username1565]

If someone cansel his leasing, then generating balance on the node is decreasing, so this transfer is a outgoing transaction from the generating balance of the node-address, and node cann't do mining, using this unleasing waves.
This is the main point, why I think,
that will be better to mark un-leasing transactions as outgoing transactions.
Yes, this is not depending from node-owner, and he don't sign this transactions,
but maybe this un-leasing is a result of strategy of his business, and in this case, the node owner can take some decisions to protect his business, if he sees that the balance on the node is reduced due to outgoing transactions to balances of his creditors, who give their WAVES to him in leasing.

[deemru]

but maybe this un-leasing is a result of strategy of his business

Then he should add this case to his code appropriate.

I do not see why it should change the global and very straightforward logic of w8io.