You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
currently the union_relations macro uses the provided where clause for all relations passed to it. In some cases, this approach is not ideal. Support for specific where clauses for each relation would allow for more flexibility in the way the macro can be deployed
Describe alternatives you've considered
CTEs would be an alternative but union_relations only takes models as inputs
Who will this benefit?
An example use case: Supports unioning differing periods together
Are you interested in contributing this feature?
sure
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been marked as Stale because it has been open for 180 days with no activity. If you would like the issue to remain open, please comment on the issue or else it will be closed in 7 days.
Although we are closing this issue as stale, it's not gone forever. Issues can be reopened if there is renewed community interest. Just add a comment to notify the maintainers.
Describe the feature
currently the
union_relations
macro uses the provided where clause for all relations passed to it. In some cases, this approach is not ideal. Support for specific where clauses for each relation would allow for more flexibility in the way the macro can be deployedDescribe alternatives you've considered
CTEs would be an alternative but union_relations only takes models as inputs
Who will this benefit?
An example use case: Supports unioning differing periods together
Are you interested in contributing this feature?
sure
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: