Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

replace with quick-protobuf #2

Open
yoshuawuyts opened this issue Apr 7, 2018 · 4 comments · Fixed by #8
Open

replace with quick-protobuf #2

yoshuawuyts opened this issue Apr 7, 2018 · 4 comments · Fixed by #8

Comments

@yoshuawuyts
Copy link
Collaborator

yoshuawuyts commented Apr 7, 2018

pure Rust & faster, means we can use it inside WASM / port it more easily https://github.com/tafia/quick-protobuf

@yoshuawuyts
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This one looks good too! https://github.com/danburkert/prost

@bltavares
Copy link
Member

Given that https://github.com/stepancheg/rust-protobuf/ is written in pure rust according to the README, is there still a reason to change the lib?

bltavares added a commit to bltavares/dat-network-protocol that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2020
This commit replaces the build.rs dev dependency to generate protobuf
files using a pure-rust implementation, removing the requirement to have
`protoc` installed and making it easier to contribute.

This commit also bumps the lib protobuf lib to the latest version, and pin it
to a specific dependency, as required by the constant it generates. Due
to requiring a specific protobuf version, a new minor version has been
bumped.

Tentatively fix datrs#2
@Frando
Copy link
Member

Frando commented Jan 24, 2020

One thing is that the structs created by quick-protobuf (or Prost, but that uses protoc still) are much leaner and lighter than the ones created by rust-protobuf.

@bltavares bltavares reopened this Feb 19, 2020
@bltavares
Copy link
Member

While the crate now uses a pure-rust lib, there is still an opportunity to improve the generated crates. I'll keep the issue opened.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants