Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conformational sampling in excited states #375

Open
rgora opened this issue Nov 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Conformational sampling in excited states #375

rgora opened this issue Nov 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@rgora
Copy link

rgora commented Nov 30, 2024

Describe the issue
Crest is capable of finding MECP's - is it possible to perform conformational sampling in excited states?
In the latter case, the excited determinants are used according to [[calculation.level]] config keyword (which seems to be undocumented btw). Would the following input perform sampling for S1 state?

To Reproduce
#This is a CREST input file
input = 'start.xyz'
runtype='imtd-gc'
threads = 8

[[calculation.level]]
method = "gfn0*"
uhf = 0
chrg = 0
config = [1,1]

@rgora rgora added the question Further information is requested label Nov 30, 2024
@pprcht
Copy link
Contributor

pprcht commented Nov 30, 2024

In principle, yes. The GFN-xTB methods can't really distinguish between S1 and T1 however.

Maybe remove the uhf line for the gfn0* case. For gfn1 and gfn2, which do not have the config option, you could use uhf=2 to achieve something similar. The uhf parameter specifies the difference amount of spin α-β electrons, so setting it to two would be a T1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants