You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the issue
Crest is capable of finding MECP's - is it possible to perform conformational sampling in excited states?
In the latter case, the excited determinants are used according to [[calculation.level]] config keyword (which seems to be undocumented btw). Would the following input perform sampling for S1 state?
To Reproduce
#This is a CREST input file
input = 'start.xyz'
runtype='imtd-gc'
threads = 8
In principle, yes. The GFN-xTB methods can't really distinguish between S1 and T1 however.
Maybe remove the uhf line for the gfn0* case. For gfn1 and gfn2, which do not have the config option, you could use uhf=2 to achieve something similar. The uhf parameter specifies the difference amount of spin α-β electrons, so setting it to two would be a T1
Describe the issue
Crest is capable of finding MECP's - is it possible to perform conformational sampling in excited states?
In the latter case, the excited determinants are used according to [[calculation.level]] config keyword (which seems to be undocumented btw). Would the following input perform sampling for S1 state?
To Reproduce
#This is a CREST input file
input = 'start.xyz'
runtype='imtd-gc'
threads = 8
[[calculation.level]]
method = "gfn0*"
uhf = 0
chrg = 0
config = [1,1]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: