Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Epic] crc should pass OpenShift conformance tests #2457

Open
3 tasks
guillaumerose opened this issue Jun 21, 2021 · 5 comments
Open
3 tasks

[Epic] crc should pass OpenShift conformance tests #2457

guillaumerose opened this issue Jun 21, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/epic Large chunk of work points/7 status/pinned Prevents the stale bot from closing the issue
Milestone

Comments

@guillaumerose
Copy link
Contributor

guillaumerose commented Jun 21, 2021

An OpenShift cluster is an OpenShift cluster as long as it passes conformance tests.
Therefore, crc should pass all those tests which a single node openshift cluster can support.

Once those tests are green in the CI we will automatically have it part of installer e2e side because it also uses same ci.sh script which snc repo contains.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 4, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the status/stale Issue went stale; did not receive attention or no reply from the OP label Sep 4, 2021
@cfergeau
Copy link
Contributor

cfergeau commented Sep 6, 2021

Still in progress

@stale stale bot removed the status/stale Issue went stale; did not receive attention or no reply from the OP label Sep 6, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 6, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the status/stale Issue went stale; did not receive attention or no reply from the OP label Nov 6, 2021
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Nov 21, 2021
@praveenkumar praveenkumar reopened this Nov 22, 2021
@stale stale bot removed the status/stale Issue went stale; did not receive attention or no reply from the OP label Nov 22, 2021
@praveenkumar
Copy link
Member

At least it should pass test matrix what openshift single can run.

@praveenkumar praveenkumar added the status/pinned Prevents the stale bot from closing the issue label Nov 22, 2021
@cfergeau
Copy link
Contributor

I ran the conformance tests (list of tests ./openshift-tests run --dry-run openshift/conformance, openshift-tests comes from github.com/openshift/origin) against crc 2.0.1:

Conformance.log:error: 5 fail, 0 pass, 0 skip (200ms)started: (0/1/5) "[Conformance][sig-api-machinery][Feature:APIServer] local kubeconfig \"lb-ext.kubeconfig\" should be present on all masters and work [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel/minimal]"
Conformance.log:error: 5 fail, 0 pass, 0 skip (200ms)started: (0/1/5) "[Conformance][sig-api-machinery][Feature:APIServer] local kubeconfig \"localhost.kubeconfig\" should be present on all masters and work [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel/minimal]"
Conformance.log:error: 5 fail, 0 pass, 0 skip (200ms)started: (0/1/5) "[Conformance][sig-api-machinery][Feature:APIServer] local kubeconfig \"lb-ext.kubeconfig\" should be present on all masters and work [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel/minimal]"
Serial.log:error: 1 fail, 0 pass, 11 skip (10m57s)
sig-apps.log:error: 1 fail, 107 pass, 7 skip (9m10s)
sig-arch.log:error: 31 fail, 14 pass, 2 skip (6.4s)
sig-auth.log:error: 2 fail, 75 pass, 2 skip (3m11s)
sig-autoscaling.log:error: 1 fail, 0 pass, 7 skip (15m0s)
sig-builds.log:error: 2 fail, 38 pass, 2 skip (15m49s)
sig-cli.log:error: 57 fail, 51 pass, 0 skip (1m38s)
sig-cluster-lifecycle.log:error: 4 fail, 2 pass, 0 skip (15m11s)
sig-etcd.log:error: 1 fail, 0 pass, 0 skip (1.3s)
sig-imageregistry.log:error: failed because an invariant was violated, 29 pass, 0 skip (1m43s)
sig-instrumentation.log:error: 16 fail, 4 pass, 0 skip (23.9s)
sig-network.log:error: 11 fail, 107 pass, 49 skip (10m54s)
sig-node.log:error: 1 fail, 127 pass, 2 skip (15m18s)
sig-operator.log:error: 1 fail, 9 pass, 0 skip (42.4s)
sig-storage.log:error: 12 fail, 353 pass, 1928 skip (29m5s)

The cluster did not have monitoring enabled, so some of the failures are expected. The sig-arch and sig-cli tests are the ones with the most failures, need to take a closer look.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/epic Large chunk of work points/7 status/pinned Prevents the stale bot from closing the issue
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants