Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
124 lines (83 loc) · 8.4 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

124 lines (83 loc) · 8.4 KB

Maps

The maps below have been created using the cldfviz.map command from the cldfviz package.

Is there colexification?

  Value Count Description
$${\color{black}⏺}$$ lexically distinct 465 The concepts ‘hand’ and ‘five’ are lexically distinct in the language.
$${\color{red}⏺}$$ full colexification 194 The concepts ‘hand’ and ‘five’ are fully colexified in the language.
$${\color{orange}⏺}$$ partial colexification 153 The concepts ‘hand’ and ‘five’ are partially colexified in the language.
$${\color{gray}⏺}$$ unknown 462 The relationship between ‘hand’ and ‘five’ is unknown in the language due to insufficient data.
    1274  

colex

View interactive map.

Is distinctness due to lexical replacement or phonological change?

For those languages that lack colexification (i.e., languages with the value “lexically distinct” for the parameter “Is there colexification?”), the values for this parameter are “lexical replacement” or “phonological change”. However, some languages exhibit both lexical replacement and (partial) colexification; this is possible when there has been replacement of both ‘hand’ and ‘five’ such that the new forms are (partially) colexified: these cases are indicated by rows in the ValueTable with an empty value and a comment “(recolexification)”.

  Value Count Description
$${\color{black}⏺}$$ lexical replacement 380 The concepts ‘hand’ and ‘five’ are distinct in the language due to lexical replacement.
$${\color{yellow}⏺}$$ phonological change 85 The concepts ‘hand’ and ‘five’ are distinct in the language due to phonological change.
    465  

dist

View interactive map.

Was there lexical replacement of ‘hand’?

  Value Count Description
$${\color{white}⏺}$$ no 428 The word for the concept ‘hand’ has not been replaced.
$${\color{red}⏺}$$ yes 390 The word for the concept ‘hand’ has been replaced.
$${\color{gray}⏺}$$ unknown 456 It is unknown whether or not the word for the concept ‘hand’ has been replaced.
    1274  

repl_hand

View interactive map.

Was there lexical replacement of ‘five’?

  Value Count Description
$${\color{white}⏺}$$ no 1121 The word for the concept ‘five’ has not been replaced.
$${\color{red}⏺}$$ yes 84 The word for the concept ‘five’ has been replaced.
$${\color{gray}⏺}$$ unknown 69 It is unknown whether or not the word for the concept ‘five’ has been replaced.
    1274  

repl_five

View interactive map.

What replaced ‘hand’?

Values for this parameter are descriptions of the most likely etymology (traced as far back as possible in the Austronesian family) given for the word in the language that came to mean ‘hand’; values followed by “?” are somewhat uncertain; and those followed by “??” are even more uncertain; when no likely etymology has been posited, then the value is given simply as “unclear” (with no preceding etymology). Values are batched into five different categories, referenced by the Code_ID column.

  Value Count Description
$${\color{black}⏺}$$ “hand” word other than *qalima 139 The word for ‘hand’ derives from a word meaning ‘hand’ or ‘arm’ other than *qalima, whether PAn *kamay ‘hand’, PMP *baRa ‘hand, arm’, or POc *minV- ‘hand’.
$${\color{red}⏺}$$ part of the arm 109 The word for ‘hand’ derives from a word referring to part of the arm, whether PAn *qabaRa ‘shoulder’, PAn *kuSkuS ‘claw, talon, fingernail’, Proto-Tsouic *ramuCu ‘finger’ (?), PMP *taŋan ‘finger, toe’, PMP *leŋen ‘forearm, lower arm’, PPh *dalukap ‘palm of the hand, sole of the foot’, or PNCV *bisu ‘finger, toe, nail’.
$${\color{yellow}⏺}$$ wing 69 The word for ‘hand’ derives from a word referring to the wing (of an animal), whether PAn *paNij ‘wing’, PMP *kapak ‘wings; flutter’, or PWOc *baqe ‘wing, (?) hand’.
$${\color{blue}⏺}$$ ‘hold onto’ 1 The word for ‘hand’ derives from ‘hold onto, cling to’.
$${\color{gray}⏺}$$ unclear 72 The word for ‘hand’ derives from a form other than *qalima, but its etymology is unclear.
    390  

hand_replacement

View interactive map.

What replaced ‘five’?

The same conventions apply here as for the parameter “What replaced hand?” except that here most entries are given a language-internal etymology. Values are batched into seven different categories, referenced by the Code_ID column.

  Value Count Description
$${\color{black}⏺}$$ “hand” word other than *qalima 45 The word for ‘five’ derives from a hand-related word unrelated to *qalima (in some cases ultimately derived from ‘finger’ or ‘wing’).
$${\color{yellow}⏺}$$ addition with 2 8 The word for ‘five’ derives from a formulation like ‘2+2+1’.
$${\color{red}⏺}$$ tally word 6 The word for ‘five’ derives from an expression apparently referring to a physical tallying practice, including words like ‘finished’, ‘on top’, or ‘make/take’.
$${\color{purple}⏺}$$ ‘count’ 2 The word for ‘five’ derives from ‘count’.
$${\color{orange}⏺}$$ addition with 4 2 The word for ‘five’ derives from a formulation like ‘4+1’.
$${\color{blue}⏺}$$ ‘part’ 1 The word for ‘five’ derives from ‘part’.
$${\color{gray}⏺}$$ unclear 20 The word for ‘five’ derives from a form other than *lima, but its etymology is unclear.
    84  

five_replacement

View interactive map.

What is the numeral system?

The values for this parameter are taken from Barlow (2023), updated here to reflect changes between Glottolog 4.6 and Glottolog 5.0: (1) badu1237 is removed (subsumed within sund1252); (2) bali1287 is added (with numeral system “unknown”); (3) dalk1234 is added (with numeral system “unknown”); (4) mori1267 is added (split from maor1246: both with numeral system “decimal proper”); and (5) ngga1239 is added (with numeral system “unknown”).

  Value Count Description
$${\color{red}⏺}$$ decimal proper 632 A decimal system with atomic numerals ‘one’ through ‘nine’.
$${\color{orange}⏺}$$ decimal modified 228 A decimal system with one or more derived numerals lower than ‘ten’.
$${\color{yellow}⏺}$$ quinary 290 A system that constructs numerals based on the number 5.
$${\color{blue}⏺}$$ binary proper 22 A system that constructs the numerals ‘three’ and ‘four’ based on the number 2.
$${\color{purple}⏺}$$ binary+3 14 A system that constructs the numeral ‘four’ based on the number 2 but has an atomic ‘three’.
$${\color{black}⏺}$$ quaternary 5 A system that constructs numerals based on the number 4.
$${\color{gray}⏺}$$ unknown 83 An unknown numeral system.
    1274  
  Value Count Description
in Melanesia 514
not in Melanesia 760

num_syst

View interactive map.