Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

have the LRS monitor readiness of all tools #13

Open
claus-zinn opened this issue Aug 10, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

have the LRS monitor readiness of all tools #13

claus-zinn opened this issue Aug 10, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
@dietervu
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@claus-zinn
Copy link
Contributor

There have been cases where tools connected to the LRS were 'down'; the resulting server errors can be frustrating for users. Investigate whether the LRS could monitor the readiness of all tools. At regular intervals it could 'ping' all tools. When errors are encountered, the LRS sends an automated email to the tool maintainer. For inspiration, see StatusCake.
Ideally, tools that are 'down' should not been shown as applicable tool (or they should have a flag 'down' attached to them).
@dietervu dietervu self-assigned this Sep 19, 2019
@dietervu
Copy link
Contributor

I have proposed an Icinga-based solution to the Leipzig monitoring team (Nathanael and Alexander). To be followed up after the migration to Icinga2 web.

@dietervu dietervu transferred this issue from clarin-eric/LRSwitchboard Sep 19, 2019
@dietervu
Copy link
Contributor

The first implementation is ready. All tools from the Tool Registry are now monitored with Icinga2. Needs some further inspection, to see if everything works as expected.

@emanueldima emanueldima added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dietervu dietervu

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@emanueldima @dietervu @claus-zinn