Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support prepared statements #246

Closed
citus-github-bot opened this issue Feb 4, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Support prepared statements #246

citus-github-bot opened this issue Feb 4, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@citus-github-bot
Copy link

Issue by jasonmp85
Thursday Sep 03, 2015 at 05:00 GMT
Originally opened as citusdata/pg_shard#140


Now that we've addressed this in CitusDB, we want to get it into pg_shard as well. We know how to do prepared statements for queries, but pg_shard must support modifications as well. Adding this support will remove a ton of friction from database adapters (such as Psycopg in Python, pg in Ruby, or the JDBC adapters in Java).

@citus-github-bot citus-github-bot added this to the Next milestone Feb 4, 2016
@citus-github-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment by makkesk8
Wednesday Jan 06, 2016 at 23:09 GMT


+1

@citus-github-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment by awolfe-silversky
Friday Jan 15, 2016 at 19:22 GMT


+1

@ozgune
Copy link
Contributor

ozgune commented Feb 5, 2016

Citus 5.0 comes with PREPARE, and we have three open issues around improving our PREPARE support.

@jasonmp85, I'm happy to update this issue in pg_shard and close it in this repository. What do you think?

@jasonmp85
Copy link
Contributor

I'm happy to update this issue in pg_shard and close it in this repository. What do you think?

I think that's a great pattern. In fact, I think we should announce the Citus 5.0 release on various pg_shard issues and close them.

@jasonmp85 jasonmp85 removed the ready label Feb 11, 2016
@jasonmp85 jasonmp85 removed this from the Next milestone Feb 11, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants