You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
e-belfer opened this issue
Jul 24, 2023
· 0 comments
Labels
data-typesDtype conversions, standardization and implications of data typesdbfData coming from FERC's old Visual FoxPro DBF database file format.ferc2Issues related to the FERC Form 2 datasetferc6ferc60new-dataRequests for integration of new data.
We've added FERC Form 2, 6 and 60 DBF data to the DBF extraction process in #1984. Let's make some quality improvements to this process by explaining size differences between FERC 1 and the newly-extracted datasets, and by building in foreign key constraint checks to ensure there are no unexpected big surprises in the raw data.
Investigate why FERC 2 and FERC 6 DBs are so much smaller relative to FERC 1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
e-belfer
added
new-data
Requests for integration of new data.
data-types
Dtype conversions, standardization and implications of data types
ferc2
Issues related to the FERC Form 2 dataset
dbf
Data coming from FERC's old Visual FoxPro DBF database file format.
ferc6
ferc60
labels
Jul 24, 2023
data-typesDtype conversions, standardization and implications of data typesdbfData coming from FERC's old Visual FoxPro DBF database file format.ferc2Issues related to the FERC Form 2 datasetferc6ferc60new-dataRequests for integration of new data.
We've added FERC Form 2, 6 and 60 DBF data to the DBF extraction process in #1984. Let's make some quality improvements to this process by explaining size differences between FERC 1 and the newly-extracted datasets, and by building in foreign key constraint checks to ensure there are no unexpected big surprises in the raw data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: