You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Seems that blocks SimpleList64<T> always have the Capacity field set to 1 when the array is empty. ResourceSimpleList32_64<T> instead seems to always have an array of Capacity > Count (not exactly equals), infact BVHNodes array has some nodes left to read although they seem to be all zeroes except for a field set at 1 (defualt init of a value type?), should we read (and write back) them too?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Seems that blocks
SimpleList64<T>
always have the Capacity field set to 1 when the array is empty.ResourceSimpleList32_64<T>
instead seems to always have an array of Capacity > Count (not exactly equals), infact BVHNodes array has some nodes left to read although they seem to be all zeroes except for a field set at 1 (defualt init of a value type?), should we read (and write back) them too?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: