You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Conventions should be established. I like the "TSW_" prefix for macros, and TSW might not be a bad prefix for many internal class names, either.
The "Impl" suffix may be a bit misleading, and should probably be replaced with something.
Includes should be sorted alphabetically, in sections: 1) libc++ headers, 2) libobs/library headers, 3) local includes.
No need for a column limit, but methods should probably not begin with the verb "get". They should, however, always begin with a verb, to clarify intent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This stuff is a mess.
Conventions should be established. I like the "TSW_" prefix for macros, and TSW might not be a bad prefix for many internal class names, either.
The "Impl" suffix may be a bit misleading, and should probably be replaced with something.
Includes should be sorted alphabetically, in sections: 1) libc++ headers, 2) libobs/library headers, 3) local includes.
No need for a column limit, but methods should probably not begin with the verb "get". They should, however, always begin with a verb, to clarify intent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: