-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
can I use the fold change values of metabolites as the effect size? #21
Comments
You can use FC values as effect sizes. But the KS test p-value does not depend on FC values, it only need the raw p-values. The zero values mean it was lower than the minimum value in R. |
Does a KS test p-value of 0 mean that the set is the most significantly changed? When handling cluster.pvalues[which(cluster.pvalues == 0)] <- 2.2e-20, should I set the p-value to the minimum value instead of 2.2e-20? |
If there is only one p-value==0, then that set is the most significant one. Yes, you can set the ks-test p-value to the minimum value returned. |
Thank you very much!But I have several sets with p-value==0,What should I do in this case? |
.Machine You can try lowering the double.eps if that returns smaller p-values. |
thank you very much!But I still haven't solved it. |
Hello, I am running ChemRich analysis in R using the script chemrich_chemical_classes.R. Can I use the fold change values of metabolites between two groups as the effect size? When I use fold change values as the effect size, many sets have cluster p-values from the KS test equal to 0.000000e+00. What could be causing this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: