You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to your paper, your result on CIFAR-100 50 steps is "Avg acc: 64.82, Last acc: 45.61"
Here is the three CIFAR-100 orders reproduction result:
Hello, Thank you for your code.
I used the setting of dytox for 50 steps, but I got a different results from your paper.
I ran cli command below
According to your paper, your result on CIFAR-100 50 steps is "Avg acc: 64.82, Last acc: 45.61"
Here is the three CIFAR-100 orders reproduction result:
cifar100_50step_results.zip
Also I will show dytox setting to you
DyTox, for CIFAR100
Model definition
model: convit
embed_dim: 384
depth: 6
num_heads: 12
patch_size: 4
input_size: 32
local_up_to_layer: 5
class_attention: true
Training setting
no_amp: true
eval_every: 50
Base hyperparameter
weight_decay: 0.000001
batch_size: 128
incremental_batch_size: 256
incremental_lr: 0.0005
rehearsal: icarl_all
Knowledge Distillation
auto_kd: true
Finetuning
finetuning: balanced
finetuning_epochs: 20
ft_no_sampling: true
Dytox model
dytox: true
freeze_task: [old_task_tokens, old_heads]
freeze_ft: [sab]
Divergence head to get diversity
head_div: 0.1
head_div_mode: tr
Independent Classifiers
ind_clf: 1-1
bce_loss: true
Advanced Augmentations, here disabled
Erasing
reprob: 0.0
remode: pixel
recount: 1
resplit: false
MixUp & CutMix
mixup: 0.0
cutmix: 0.0
I can't understand why my reproduction results differ from the results you wrote in your paper.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: