Sr

[kooomix]

PR Type

Tests, Bug fix

---

Description

• Updated test_job configurations in security risks tests.

• Added fix_object and test_scenario fields to test_job.

• Ensured consistency across test configurations for security risks.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Tests	security_risks_tests.py Update security risks test configurations                                configurations/system/tests_cases/security_risks_tests.py Updated test_job dictionary to include fix_object and test_scenario. Modified sr_with_exceptions and sr_ac_scan_status test configurations. Ensured consistency in test parameters for security risks. +2/-2

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any question about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Configuration Consistency Verify that the added test_scenario value 'attack-chain-5' in test_job matches the test configuration's test_scenario field and is the correct scenario for these security risk tests test_job=[{"trigger_by": "scan_on_start", "fix_object": "control","security_risks_ids": ["R_0005"], "test_scenario": "attack-chain-5"}],

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
General	Remove duplicate configuration parameters to prevent potential inconsistencies in test execution Remove the redundant test_scenario parameter from the test_job dictionary since it's already defined at the TestConfiguration level. Having it in both places could lead to inconsistencies if values differ. configurations/system/tests_cases/security_risks_tests.py [116] -test_job=[{"trigger_by": "scan_on_start", "fix_object": "control","security_risks_ids": ["R_0005"], "test_scenario": "attack-chain-5"}], +test_job=[{"trigger_by": "scan_on_start", "fix_object": "control", "security_risks_ids": ["R_0005"]}], Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Having the test_scenario defined both in TestConfiguration and test_job dictionary could lead to maintenance issues and potential inconsistencies. The suggestion correctly identifies this redundancy and provides a cleaner solution.	8
	Eliminate redundant configuration to maintain a single source of truth for test parameters Remove the redundant fix_object parameter from the test_job dictionary since it's already defined at the TestConfiguration level, to maintain a single source of truth for this configuration. configurations/system/tests_cases/security_risks_tests.py [116-117] -test_job=[{"trigger_by": "scan_on_start", "fix_object": "control","security_risks_ids": ["R_0005"], "test_scenario": "attack-chain-5"}], +test_job=[{"trigger_by": "scan_on_start", "security_risks_ids": ["R_0005"]}], fix_object="control", Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies the redundancy of having fix_object defined in both the test_job dictionary and TestConfiguration. Removing this duplication reduces the risk of inconsistencies and improves maintainability.	8

[github-actions]

Failed to generate code suggestions for PR