Fix configmap name

[dwertent]

PR Type:

Refactoring

---

PR Description:

This PR includes changes to the ConfigMap name used in the Kubescape tests. The ConfigMap name 'kubescape-config' has been replaced with 'KS_CONFIG' to reflect the changes in the system under test. The changes are made in the following files:

• systest_utils/statics.py
• tests_scripts/kubescape/config.py

---

PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:

systest_utils/statics.py: Replaced 'kubescape-config' with 'KS_CONFIG'. Also, added a new constant 'KS_SECRET'.
tests_scripts/kubescape/config.py: Updated the ConfigMap name in the 'start', 'compare_set_result', and 'compare_view_result' methods from 'kubescape-config' to 'KS_CONFIG'.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: The main theme of this PR is to refactor the ConfigMap name used in the Kubescape tests.
• 📝 PR summary: This PR includes changes to the ConfigMap name used in the Kubescape tests. The ConfigMap name 'kubescape-config' has been replaced with 'KS_CONFIG' to reflect the changes in the system under test. The changes are made in the following files: systest_utils/statics.py and tests_scripts/kubescape/config.py.
• 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, The PR is relatively small and straightforward, focusing on replacing a ConfigMap name in a few places. However, it requires knowledge of the system under test to understand the implications of the change.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No

PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and the changes are clear. However, it would be beneficial to include a brief explanation of why the ConfigMap name was changed. This could help other developers understand the reasoning behind the change and its potential impact on the system.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: systest_utils/statics.py
    suggestion: Consider using a more descriptive name for the new constant 'KS_SECRET'. The current name does not provide much context about its purpose or usage. [medium]
    relevant line: KS_SECRET = "cloud-secret"

  • relevant file: tests_scripts/kubescape/config.py
    suggestion: It's recommended to handle potential exceptions when working with JSON data. Consider adding error handling for 'json.loads()' to prevent the program from crashing if the JSON data is not properly formatted. [important]
    relevant line: cm_dict = json.loads(cm_data)

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

[github-actions]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Refactoring ConfigMap name in Kubescape tests
• 📝 PR summary: This PR includes changes to the ConfigMap name used in the Kubescape tests. The ConfigMap name 'kubescape-config' has been replaced with 'KS_CONFIG' to reflect the changes in the system under test. The changes are made in the files 'systest_utils/statics.py' and 'tests_scripts/kubescape/config.py'.
• 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, the PR is relatively small and straightforward, focusing on renaming a ConfigMap.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and the changes are clear. However, it would be beneficial to include tests that verify the correct functioning of the updated ConfigMap name.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: systest_utils/statics.py
    suggestion: Consider using a more descriptive name for the 'KS_SECRET' constant. It's not clear what this secret is used for. [medium]
    relevant line: KS_SECRET = "cloud-secret"

  • relevant file: tests_scripts/kubescape/config.py
    suggestion: It would be beneficial to handle the case where the 'config.json' key is not present in the ConfigMap data to avoid a KeyError. [important]
    relevant line: cm_data = cm_obj.data["config.json"]

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.