Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

High U-Values lead to big deviations between hourly and monthly calculation #125

Open
kuhnal opened this issue Feb 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@kuhnal
Copy link
Collaborator

kuhnal commented Feb 23, 2021

The "worse" U-values for envelope components are, the bigger is the difference of calculated energy demands between the hourly and monthly approach.
@Linwal has this occurred to you too?
I guess it is because of the underlying calculation approach but I have to check whether this is not a different/bigger problem.

@kuhnal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kuhnal commented Feb 25, 2021

So far, I could not find any issue causing this trouble other than the different calculation between the two approaches.

@Linwal
Copy link
Collaborator

Linwal commented Mar 1, 2021

Thank you for pointing this out. It must be something that depends on the dynamics of the heat transfer because these mechanisms are different in the RC Simulation compared to the quasi-static approach of SIA380-1.

I'll have to further look into this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants