You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The "worse" U-values for envelope components are, the bigger is the difference of calculated energy demands between the hourly and monthly approach. @Linwal has this occurred to you too?
I guess it is because of the underlying calculation approach but I have to check whether this is not a different/bigger problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for pointing this out. It must be something that depends on the dynamics of the heat transfer because these mechanisms are different in the RC Simulation compared to the quasi-static approach of SIA380-1.
The "worse" U-values for envelope components are, the bigger is the difference of calculated energy demands between the hourly and monthly approach.
@Linwal has this occurred to you too?
I guess it is because of the underlying calculation approach but I have to check whether this is not a different/bigger problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: