Catchup=FALSE but it still run for missing Task? #45274
Labels
area:core
kind:bug
This is a clearly a bug
needs-triage
label for new issues that we didn't triage yet
Apache Airflow version
Other Airflow 2 version (please specify below)
If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
2.10.2
What happened?
Hi All,
Why does my DAG still behave like catchup=True and run for the missing DAG run when I change the schedule interval? I already set it to False, but why is it still running for the missing DAG run?
DAG code:
What you think should happen instead?
When I changed the schedule interval, the DAG should skip the missing run and run only one task.
How to reproduce
schedule_value
as a Airflow variableOperating System
Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.28.0
apache-airflow-providers-celery==3.8.1
apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes==8.4.1
apache-airflow-providers-common-compat==1.2.0
apache-airflow-providers-common-io==1.4.0
apache-airflow-providers-common-sql==1.16.0
apache-airflow-providers-docker==3.13.0
apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch==5.5.0
apache-airflow-providers-fab==1.3.0
apache-airflow-providers-ftp==3.11.0
apache-airflow-providers-google==10.22.0
apache-airflow-providers-grpc==3.6.0
apache-airflow-providers-hashicorp==3.8.0
apache-airflow-providers-http==4.13.0
apache-airflow-providers-imap==3.7.0
apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure==10.4.0
apache-airflow-providers-mysql==5.7.0
apache-airflow-providers-odbc==4.7.0
apache-airflow-providers-openlineage==1.11.0
apache-airflow-providers-postgres==5.12.0
apache-airflow-providers-redis==3.8.0
apache-airflow-providers-sendgrid==3.6.0
apache-airflow-providers-sftp==4.11.0
apache-airflow-providers-slack==8.9.0
apache-airflow-providers-smtp==1.8.0
apache-airflow-providers-snowflake==5.7.0
apache-airflow-providers-sqlite==3.9.0
apache-airflow-providers-ssh==3.13.1
Deployment
Official Apache Airflow Helm Chart
Deployment details
helm, on AWS EKS
Anything else?
No.
Are you willing to submit PR?
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: