You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current rhalf comes from Okamoto et al 2023, from fitting resolved stars.
The fits in this paper with the current rhalf seem reasonable.
It's pretty clear that this is larger then the diameter in SGA-2020. This may be due to resolved stars/versus integrated light and the data targeting different stellar populations.
The diameter recorded for NGC 3077 (24 arcmin) is far too large; LVGDB lists 6.46 arcmin and SGA-2020 records 9.267 arcmin. I would adopt the SGA-2020 value--
https://relay.sao.ru/lv/lvgdb/object.php?name=NGC3077&id=175
https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer?ra=150.8347&dec=68.7344&layer=ls-dr9-north&zoom=11&sga
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: