Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add a "this definition has worked [ ___ ] days without modification." tag to each item #1

Open
andrew-johnson-4 opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Add a "this definition has worked [ ___ ] days without modification." tag to each item #1

andrew-johnson-4 opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@andrew-johnson-4
Copy link
Owner

andrew-johnson-4 commented Jan 15, 2025 •
edited
Loading

"This definition has gone [ ___ ] days without modification. YOU can prevent deprecation; contact your local RFC to learn how."
@andrew-johnson-4
Copy link
Owner Author

andrew-johnson-4 commented Jan 15, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Was just browsing through "stable" interfaces that were added to docs. The set[] method for hashtables definitely needs a new type signature. So yes, we will have deprecation. This is a community issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@andrew-johnson-4