You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In preprocessing-op-or-punc, and, and_eq, bitand... are defined as keywords. However, logical-and-expression doesn't reflect this keyword and. Neither are other keywords. This grammar is actually inherited from C programming specifiction. Particularly in header <iso646.h>, these are "Alternative Spellings". I wonder if C++ grammar should specifically add a rule about this, or do we expect C++ grammar to be built upon C-grammar?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In preprocessing-op-or-punc, and, and_eq, bitand... are defined as keywords. However, logical-and-expression doesn't reflect this keyword and. Neither are other keywords. This grammar is actually inherited from C programming specifiction. Particularly in header <iso646.h>, these are "Alternative Spellings". I wonder if C++ grammar should specifically add a rule about this, or do we expect C++ grammar to be built upon C-grammar?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: