-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 158
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
question about fashionbert #10
Comments
(1) We do not attempt to train fashionbert only with image-text-matching task. Since we evaluate fashionbert model with fashion-gen dataset, we donot perform fine-tuning again. (2) Need to resize the image patch to fit the feature extraction. (3) Resnet50 |
Thanks a lot! |
|
When you run_train.sh first time, ez will automatically download model to modelZooBasePath. Pleas check your os.getenv("HOME") / eztransfer_modelzoo. |
You can conduct two experiments to compare the two pretrained models. |
Thank you for your excellent work. May I ask one following-up question about FashionBERT? |
Thanks for sharing your code! I have the following questions about fasionbert.
(1) Have you evaluated the performance of fasionbert without pretraining? That is, training a model by removing mlm and mpm only with image-text-matching task. Besides, There are not fine-tuning on downstream task (eg. image-text matching). So why do you call that as pertaining instead of training.
(2) Have you resize the image patch (3232->224224) for image feature extraction?
(3) Which backbone network is selected for image feature extraction in your released pertained model? resnet50 or resnext101?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: