You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Like the opening peaks, the closing peak can be imprecise and there are various different types which shouldn't be treated by the same method. Therefore, in the part that peakdet asks for user's verification of f0 (besides resetting the threshold, or suppressing the initial or final cycles), the choice of selecting other method to handle multiple peaks shoud be offered here.
User can type >>0 for 'selecting the highest among the peaks'; >>1 for 'selecting the first peak', etc.
The f0 and oq values after that will be re-caculated according to the new method which is more suitable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
alexis-michaud
changed the title
Handling multi-closing peaks: display a command to change the method
Handling multiple closing peaks: displaying a command to change the method
Mar 5, 2019
An overhaul is under way. This request has been integrated to the project for version 1.1. The various possibilities for f0 will be proposed first, and Oq calculated later.
Like the opening peaks, the closing peak can be imprecise and there are various different types which shouldn't be treated by the same method. Therefore, in the part that peakdet asks for user's verification of f0 (besides resetting the threshold, or suppressing the initial or final cycles), the choice of selecting other method to handle multiple peaks shoud be offered here.
User can type >>0 for 'selecting the highest among the peaks'; >>1 for 'selecting the first peak', etc.
The f0 and oq values after that will be re-caculated according to the new method which is more suitable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: