We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently, quality::in_left_arg and quality::in_right_arg makes the following provable:
quality::in_left_arg
quality::in_right_arg
(a ~~ a) & (a == b) => (b ~~ b)
This is not provable in PSQ in Pocket-Prover, but one can prove the following:
(a ~~ a) & hom_eq(2, a, b) => (b ~~ b)
https://advancedresearch.github.io/quality/summary.html#psq---path-semantical-quantum-propositional-logic hom_eq(2, a, b) == ((a == b) ⋀ (qubit(a) == qubit(b))) by Hom-2.
hom_eq(2, a, b) == ((a == b) ⋀ (qubit(a) == qubit(b)))
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Currently,
quality::in_left_arg
andquality::in_right_arg
makes the following provable:This is not provable in PSQ in Pocket-Prover, but one can prove the following:
https://advancedresearch.github.io/quality/summary.html#psq---path-semantical-quantum-propositional-logic
hom_eq(2, a, b) == ((a == b) ⋀ (qubit(a) == qubit(b)))
by Hom-2.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: