You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that the Wagner graph, despite being the same graph, has a different "feeling" than the Möbius strip perspective. The first picture gives a sense of Satisfaction, while the second picture gives a sense of Restlessness.
The Wagner graph is a minimum discrete embedding of the Möbius topology. It is a filled Avatar Graph, which algorithm was extended from Cartesian stair-pair combinatorics, precisely to allow Möbius topologies.
In Joker Calculus (dual in Closed variant):
(0 ?0, 1 0) = ?(0 ?0) restlessness in 0
(1 0, 0 ?0) = ?(1 0) satisfaction in 0
!?(1 0) = ?(0 ?0) in Open & Closed variant
!?(0 ?0) = ?(1 ??0) in Open variant, ?(1 0) in Closed variant
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Could Satisfaction and Restlessness be expressible in Joker Calculus? Are they dual language biases?
This idea came up during a reading group about Jean-Luc Nancy's commentary on Hegel (first chapter): https://monoskop.org/images/0/03/Nancy_Jean_Luc_Hegel_The_Restlessness_of_the_Negative_2002.pdf
I noticed that the Wagner graph, despite being the same graph, has a different "feeling" than the Möbius strip perspective. The first picture gives a sense of Satisfaction, while the second picture gives a sense of Restlessness.
The Wagner graph is a minimum discrete embedding of the Möbius topology. It is a filled Avatar Graph, which algorithm was extended from Cartesian stair-pair combinatorics, precisely to allow Möbius topologies.
In Joker Calculus (dual in Closed variant):
(0 ?0, 1 0) = ?(0 ?0)
restlessness in0
(1 0, 0 ?0) = ?(1 0)
satisfaction in0
!?(1 0) = ?(0 ?0)
in Open & Closed variant!?(0 ?0) = ?(1 ??0)
in Open variant,?(1 0)
in Closed variantThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: