You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
1 + n' equals the nth minus 1 prime in base 0, because 2' is the first prime.
So, 1 + 1' = 2'.
Notice that 1 is 3', so 3' + 1' = 2'.
This introduces the somewhat counter-intuitive idea that addition in Algexenotation can result in a smaller original number than any of the original arguments.
One can also write 1 + 1' = 0. Notice the similarity to 1 + (-1) = 0.
Other identities:
0 + 2' = 0 trivial, since `0 + 0 = 0`
0 + 1' = 1' non-trivial, but fits with `1 + 1' = 2'`
0 + 0' = 0' non-trivial, but fits with `0 + x = x` for all `x`
Now, think about these as corners of a square:
0 + 0' = 0' 1 + 0' = ?
0 + 1' = 1' 1 + 1' = 2'
It seems natural that ? is larger than 0' but smaller than 2'.
There is only one number with this property, which is 1'.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The reason
1 + 0' = 1'
:1 + 2' = 1 + 0 = 1 = 3'
1 + n'
equals the nth minus 1 prime in base 0, because2'
is the first prime.So,
1 + 1' = 2'
.Notice that
1
is3'
, so3' + 1' = 2'
.This introduces the somewhat counter-intuitive idea that addition in Algexenotation can result in a smaller original number than any of the original arguments.
One can also write
1 + 1' = 0
. Notice the similarity to1 + (-1) = 0
.Other identities:
Now, think about these as corners of a square:
It seems natural that
?
is larger than0'
but smaller than2'
.There is only one number with this property, which is
1'
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: