Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Near field calculation #10

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 12, 2015 · 7 comments
Open

Near field calculation #10

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 12, 2015 · 7 comments
Assignees
@myurkin
Labels
comp-Logic Related to internal code logic performance Simulation speed, memory consumption pri-Medium Worth assigning to a milestone usability Makes using code more convenient
Milestone
1.6

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link 

Think of a convenient way to calculate near field in a number of points or
on a grid around the particle. Possibly implement calculation of the
B-field together with E-field.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by yurkin on 26 Nov 2008 at 8:13
@GoogleCodeExporter GoogleCodeExporter added OpSys-All usability Makes using code more convenient comp-Logic Related to internal code logic pri-Medium Worth assigning to a milestone labels Aug 12, 2015
@GoogleCodeExporter GoogleCodeExporter mentioned this issue Aug 12, 2015
Closed
@myurkin myurkin added feature Allows new functionality and removed Type-Enhancement labels Aug 13, 2015
@myurkin myurkin self-assigned this Nov 12, 2015
@myurkin
Copy link
Member

myurkin commented Nov 12, 2015

/cc @fabiods

@myurkin myurkin added pri-Low Kept mostly for reference pri-Medium Worth assigning to a milestone and removed pri-Medium Worth assigning to a milestone pri-Low Kept mostly for reference labels Jul 10, 2018
@myurkin myurkin added this to the 1.6 milestone Jul 10, 2018
@myurkin
Copy link
Member

myurkin commented Jun 22, 2019

Robustness of handling shape files for misc/near_field has been improved by #259 (was not compatible with the master branch of adda). Now it also works fine for inhomogeneous particles.

@myurkin myurkin added performance Simulation speed, memory consumption and removed feature Allows new functionality labels Apr 24, 2021
@myurkin
Copy link
Member

myurkin commented Oct 9, 2021

Other potentially interesting quantities are Poynting vector, field chirality (proportional to Im(E*.H)), and Maxwell's stress tensor.

Also, it should be possible to compute field derivatives - either numerically, as e.g. in the pyGDM, or analytically. The latter is related to #14 (and can be addressed similarly).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@myurkin myurkin

Labels
comp-Logic Related to internal code logic performance Simulation speed, memory consumption pri-Medium Worth assigning to a milestone usability Makes using code more convenient
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.6
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@myurkin @GoogleCodeExporter