Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Artifact Extendability #4

Open
jon-bell opened this issue Nov 24, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Artifact Extendability #4

jon-bell opened this issue Nov 24, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
policy An issue about refining a policy

Comments

@jon-bell
Copy link
Collaborator

To what extent should reviewers try to extend an artifact (build on a tool, analyze a dataset in a new way, or provide new inputs/configurations to that tool or analysis), in comparison to simply running it?
@jon-bell jon-bell added the policy An issue about refining a policy label Nov 24, 2019
@sbaltes
Copy link

sbaltes commented Nov 30, 2019

I would consider running/verifying the artifact as the baseline and everything else nice to have, but not required.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
policy An issue about refining a policy
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jon-bell @sbaltes