Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluation on Emu Edit benchmark #164

Open
Eureka-Maggie opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Evaluation on Emu Edit benchmark #164

Eureka-Maggie opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@Eureka-Maggie
Copy link

Hi,

Noticed that there are known issues with the Emu edit benchmark: some image-caption pairs seem incorrect (e.g., 'a train station in city') or identical source and target captions. So I was wondering how to calculate clip_T metric. How did you process the benchmark dataset?

Looking forward to your reply.

@staoxiao
Copy link
Contributor

@Eureka-Maggie, we just use the original caption without any modification.

@Eureka-Maggie
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your reply. So there are some unpaired output caption and generated images when calculating clip-t metrics.

@staoxiao
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, there is some noise in emu-edit.

@zc1023
Copy link

zc1023 commented Feb 22, 2025

Hello, I am reproducing the results on the emu dataset. But the result I measured is much higher than yours. Can you provide the specific details? For example, seed, resolution, and clip models.

@staoxiao
Copy link
Contributor

@zc1023 , the clip model is openai/clip-vit-large-patch14 and resolution is 512.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants