Rail noise sources - impact noise and contact filter #677
Unanswered
espen-wold-adsk
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
Thank you very much for your comment ! We will look at it and come back to you :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Hi Espen, Thank you for your very pertinent comments. You're absolutely right on both issues.
Just one question: which document are you referring to when you mention the CNOSSOS documentation ? Regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
I am looking at your code - and in particular some of your unit tests - in an attempt to use it as an independent verification for the results of my own implementation of CNOSSOS. In the area of rail noise sources I came across a few discrepancies that I would love to get your thoughts on:
It looks like your code applies the contact filter to the total roughness after adding the contribution from impact noise, while the CNOSSOS documentation seems to imply that the impact noise should be added to the total-roughness-after-application-of-contact-filter (equations IV-6 and IV-10). I verified this by modifying the order of operations in my own code, and thus producing values matching the expected output in some of your tests.
If I am reading your code correct, you are not making use of a 'JoinDensity' parameter, and rather directly applying what I had interpreted as
L_R, Impact-single
as per equation IV-11 in the CNOSSOS documentation.I hope you have time to help me understand these discrepancies!
Regards,
Espen
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions