-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add in new questions for the new variables in the 2023 version of the Overpayment Waiver #119
Comments
New Variables for the Overpayment Waiver Include: Page 1: requestor_relationship | Text | New version of the form removed the YesNoRadio variables and replaced them with text boxes that answer similar questions. We need to include new questions for the new field labels and remove the questions for the old field labels. The new questions should have answer choice options for the user that resemble the options on the old form + an 'other' option if the relationship is not one of the options listed Page 2: total_over_one_thousand | YesNoRadio | Need to add in question for this waive_remaining_amount | YesNoRadio | Need to add in question for this; asks "If No (ie 'overpayment_waive_everything_no = True) are you requesting that we only waive the amount of money that you owe us?" waive_remaining_amount_no | YesNoRadio | Need to add in question for this; asks "If No (ie 'overpayment_waive_everything_no = True) are you requesting that we only waive the amount of money that you owe us?" receiving_ssi_no | YesNoRadio | Need to add in question/logic for this Page 3: non_tax_dependent_contributes_to_expenses_yes | YesNoRadio | On the current version of the interview these field labels are backward (ie the "non_tax_dependent_contributes_to_expenses_no" is tagged on the "yes" option and "non_tax_dependent_contributes_to_expenses_yes" is tagged on the "no" option - need to correct the interview logic/questions - I tagged the fields appropriately on the new version of the form cash_amount | Text | Need to add in question/logic for this field label Page 4: client_owns_real_estate_no | YesNoRadio | These Questions are asked in a different way on the updated version of the form; the old version asks "Do you, your spouse, or your dependents own any real estate other than where you live?" and the new version asks "Do you co-own any real estate with anyone other than your spouse and dependent family member?" - Need to re-write question on interview but can keep field label the same real_property_owner_2 | Text | This field label has a '#0' next to it on the old version real_property_owner_3 | Text | In the old version, this field label is 'real_property_owner_2#1' - see if there is a bug in the current interview with this and correct it so that it properly is asked and recorded on the form real_property_loan_balance_2 | Text | In the old version, this field label is 'real_property_loan_balance_2#1' business_owner_2 | Text | In the old version, this field label is 'business_owner2#0' business_owner_3 | Text | In the old version, this field label is 'business_owner_2#1' - see if there is a bug in the current interview with this and correct it so that it property asks for and records answer on the form can_sell_yes | YesNoRadio | Need to add in questions/logic for these field labels - question asks "Can you sell or liquidate any of the assets listed above?" can_sell_no | YesNoRadio | Need to add in questions/logic for these field labels - question asks "Can you sell or liquidate any of the assets listed above?" can_sell_explanation | Text | Need to add in a question/logic for this field label - ask user to explain which assets they can sell or liquidate Page 5: Page 9: |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: