Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Vanilla Bug] OpenTopped Passengers Ignored Range Bonus From SubjectToElevation=yes #1540

Open
6 tasks done
ahsy666 opened this issue Feb 22, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
6 tasks done

Comments

@ahsy666
Copy link

ahsy666 commented Feb 22, 2025

Description

Just watch the video, it shows clearly.

Reunion.2023.2025.02.23.-.00.46.18.07.2.mp4

From left to right are, a BFRT with 5 elite GIs, 1 elite deployed GI, an empty BFRT. I deleted range bonus for opentopped passangers to make it more obvious.

I think the reason is, passanger's actual height won't consider in opentopped vehicles.

Conditions to reproduce

No response

INI code

[CombatDamage]
OpenToppedRangeBonus=0

[ParaE]
Projectile=InvisibleLow

[InvisibleLow]
SubjectToElevation=yes

Steps to reproduce

...

Expected behaviour

GI in BFRT should have longer attack range in higher places.

Actual behaviour

GI(or other passangers) won't get elevation range bonus in opentopped vehicles.

Additional context

No response

Checklist

  • The issue is not introduced by Phobos or any other engine extension, such as Ares, Kratos etc.
  • The issue wasn't fixed in the most recent version of Ares/Phobos yet.
  • I agree to elaborate the details if requested and provide thorough testing if the bugfix is implemented.
  • I added a very descriptive title to this issue.
  • I used the GitHub search and read the issue list to find a similar issue and didn't find it.
  • I have attached as much information as possible (screenshots, gifs, videos, debug and exception logs, etc).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant