Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unable to run tests on some tokens with graphene-cli #85

Open
rmhrisk opened this issue Sep 23, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Unable to run tests on some tokens with graphene-cli #85

rmhrisk opened this issue Sep 23, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@rmhrisk
Copy link
Contributor

rmhrisk commented Sep 23, 2017

I have a SafeNet 5100, I am able to enumerate the supported algorithms with grapgene-cli but I am not able to successfully execute the batch perf tests.

For example, here is a subset of capabilities:

Algorithm name h s v e d w u g D
RSA_PKCS_KEY_PAIR_GEN x
RSA_PKCS x x x x x x

If I run:

> test gen --alg RSA_PKCS_KEY_PAIR_GEN  --it 2

Error: No such algorithm

I think this is impacting our document signing cases with this token.

It also seems we are seeing something similar with a NitroKey #83

@rmhrisk
Copy link
Contributor Author

rmhrisk commented Sep 23, 2017

A new mechanism was recently added in a PR, the test failure in CI has no relation to this issue here it seems. Hopefully, 51ff1b7 will fix it.

@rmhrisk
Copy link
Contributor Author

rmhrisk commented Sep 26, 2017

There is a new change in the graphene-cli and it should make this work, see - PeculiarVentures/graphene-cli#5

We will need to update the capabilities documents for each document.

@rmhrisk
Copy link
Contributor Author

rmhrisk commented Sep 26, 2017

@jspark311 can you see if this fixes your issue with the NitroKey?

@rmhrisk
Copy link
Contributor Author

rmhrisk commented Sep 26, 2017

@nickrmc83 would you be able to re-run the Thales capabilities?

@nickrmc83
Copy link
Contributor

nickrmc83 commented Sep 27, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants