-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Milestone One ToDos ? #2
Comments
I would like to focus in: What do you think? |
I want to be focus in Web services and Solr engine realted things. |
Subject to your approval, I would also suggest we assume different roles in the project:
Would you agree ? |
Rui I can help you also with the database, I want to refresh some concepts that would be importat for me. |
Ok, I have updated my previous comments. |
My intention is that the person(s) who are working on that component has the flexibility to create issues and organise todos. |
We can create milestone and issues in each component and the person that is working in the components can work in the issues, etc. Them we can plug the components. The main person responsable for the component should follow each issue, etc. |
Good point Yasset, I have already created the first milestone in all our components yesterday, I think we can just reuse it. |
Hi Guys, I would like to be a key person in the search for two reasons. First of all I think that, although Noe started doing some development, most of the current code is mine, specially that related with the spectral search (I know is future work), the current data model and service, and with future scalability improvements. So here I would put Noe and myself as decisions makers. Also Noe has lots of pressure from the Archive and I don't think is practical to leave her with too much responsibility. In the web, I can be responsible for a while. Let us say until the knowledge is transferred to the team, or until the 31st of March milestone. But in any case, I think all contributions are welcome from every side. We shouldn't stop anybody to open issues or assign them to her/himself after the approval of the person that owns most of the code in that particular part. I agree with the rest of the proposal :) |
@jadianes , I see your point. Actually, I was just talking about for milestone one. And of course, you will be the key person for the spectral search in the future. But this will be part of milestone two. Do you still want to change the key person? |
To everyone, the idea of key person is to share responsibility and enable individuals to make decisions freely. Everyone are of course welcome to contribute to other part, but I thought that it is better to have some focus and an anchor point, and it is better to be upfront about this. |
Yes. Even for the first milestone I think it makes complete sense to keep me as one of the key persons. Again, my reasons are expertise and availability. |
Great, I have changed the post. |
As of next, shall we each create the todos in the form of issues on GitHub? I have done some for the cluster-repo component already. |
Sure. cluster-web & co have already issues :) |
Since Noe is not going to be here on Thursday, I think we should start discussing the todos and who does what. Let's use this issue to track our discussion.
To me, the key facts for milestone one is:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: