We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I would abandon t4p4s and just use the new p4lang/p4c/backends/dpdpk which supports header stack.
Also, my company's (closed, not open-sourced) P4toVPP p4c backend also supports header stack.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry, something went wrong.
Yes, the p4c dpdk backend was presented at the 2021 P4 WS. This backend supports header stack and thus you could use this new backend - thanks.
No branches or pull requests
I would abandon t4p4s and just use the new p4lang/p4c/backends/dpdpk which supports header stack.
Also, my company's (closed, not open-sourced) P4toVPP p4c backend also supports header stack.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: