land_cover features overlap, which is unexpected #168
-
Category FeedbackI have been examining the land_cover type in 2024-05-16-beta.0, and it looks good, but i have noticed that there is significant overlap between feature types within a zoom range. Within a zoom range, like cartography.min_zoom = 8 and cartography.max_zoom = 15, i would expect features to not overlap because land_cover is generally categorical, it's either forest or grass, not both. At first I thought this must be an issue of how i was importing the data, but i followed the instructions at https://docs.overturemaps.org/examples/QGIS/ to import landcover into qgis, and saw the issue there. GeoJSON file: https://gist.github.com/JesseCrocker/320d82f746d8f44055c0d73ab21d841b Dependency with other categories, if any.No response |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
hey @JesseCrocker, we added overlap to the extraction process to prevent slivers, gaps, etc... we've added an additional cartographic property, from the accepted happy to help with any other questions! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Just encountered this myself. Is the code for translating from ESA world cover to OMF base/landcover publicly available ? My interest is not in cartography really but analysis and these overlaps can result in unexpected issues and workarounds. Incidentally, I am curious where the slivers and gaps arise from ? I ask because the base dataset is a raster. My best guess is that you did not want 'blocky' polygons and some smoothing is involved ? Would it somehow be possible to separate out the overlaps into separate geometries and denote them as such ? But apart from these issues - this dataset is quite useful ! thanks for adding it to the collection 👍 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
hey @JesseCrocker, we added overlap to the extraction process to prevent slivers, gaps, etc... we've added an additional cartographic property,
sort_key
to the next overture release which defines the recommended feature layering order for land cover. keep in mind these are the raw extractions, there should be some expected processing of the data to suit specific needs.from the accepted
sort_key
pr:happy to help with any other questions!