You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Other location identifier, if any (e.g., figure number, table number, footnote number, etc.): Near Figure 16.1
Simulated frequency of 420 has to be for complications <= 2 instead <= 3.
Expected frequency for <= 3 using the binomial distribution is 1210, and for <= 2 450.
So the p-value for <= 0.048 has to be around 0.121.
The bar in Figure 16.1 over 5 has to be blue, too.
Subsequent conclusions are also wrong.
@hardin47 I assigned this back to you because I'm not sure I follow the comment. I'm probably missing something but thought you might have more context.
We need to change the simulation to be p_sim <= 0.0484 (round up instead of round down) to catch the actual observed value. I think it will make the p-value 0.121-ish, so not statistically discernible (narrative will also need to change).
Chapter number: 16
Section number: 1.3
Other location identifier, if any (e.g., figure number, table number, footnote number, etc.): Near Figure 16.1
Simulated frequency of 420 has to be for complications <= 2 instead <= 3.
Expected frequency for <= 3 using the binomial distribution is 1210, and for <= 2 450.
So the p-value for <= 0.048 has to be around 0.121.
The bar in Figure 16.1 over 5 has to be blue, too.
Subsequent conclusions are also wrong.
submitted by: [email protected]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: