Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I think that Zlib should be marked as compatible with itself. #64

Open
Lokathor opened this issue Nov 26, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

I think that Zlib should be marked as compatible with itself. #64

Lokathor opened this issue Nov 26, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@Lokathor
Copy link

D:\dev\imagine>cargo lichking check
warning: IANAL: This is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct.
  Downloaded bytemuck v1.0.1
  Downloaded 1 crates (10.2 KB) in 0.95s
warning: imagine might not be able to include package bytemuck, license Zlib is not known to be compatible with Zlib

Seems silly that Zlib isn't compatible with itself.

@Nemo157
Copy link
Owner

Nemo157 commented Nov 26, 2019

It would probably make sense to include a general self-reflexive compatibility, having a license that doesn't let itself be linked with code from another identically licensed crate doesn't really make sense for any meaning of compatibility.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants