Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Idea]: Add -b Option for Specifying Biomes in World Creation Command #3108

Open
1 task done
NeverGame opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #2824
Open
1 task done

[Idea]: Add -b Option for Specifying Biomes in World Creation Command #3108

NeverGame opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #2824
Labels
5.0.0 Next major release. Type: Idea Suggestion for a new feature or enhancement.

Comments

@NeverGame
Copy link

Describe the feature

I am suggesting the implementation of a new option, -b or --biome, for the /mv create command in Multiverse-Core. This option would enable server administrators to specify a single biome for the entire world during its creation. This feature should work in conjunction with custom world generators, allowing for more precise control over the world's environment, enabling servers to create themed worlds, adventure maps, or specialized farming worlds, among other uses.

How is the feature useful to all Multiverse users?

The addition of a biome-specific world generation option would be greatly beneficial to all segments of the Multiverse community:

  • Players would enjoy a more diverse range of worlds to explore, each with its own unique theme or challenge based on the single-biome environment.
  • Server owners could design and offer new experiences with worlds tailored to specific biomes, improving engagement and offering variety without the need for multiple plugins or complex setup procedures.
  • Developers would find it easier to create and test features or maps within a consistent biome, ensuring uniformity and predictability in world generation.

In essence, this feature would enhance Multiverse-Core's flexibility and the creative control server administrators have over their worlds, adding another layer of customization to their servers' offerings.

Agreements

  • I have searched for and ensured there isn't already an open issue regarding this.
@NeverGame NeverGame added the Type: Idea Suggestion for a new feature or enhancement. label Sep 16, 2024
@NeverGame NeverGame changed the title **[Idea]: Add -b Option for Specifying Biomes in World Creation Command** [Idea]: Add -b Option for Specifying Biomes in World Creation Command Sep 16, 2024
@NeverGame NeverGame changed the title [Idea]: Add -b Option for Specifying Biomes in World Creation Command [Idea]: Add -b Option for Specifying Biomes in World Creation Command Sep 16, 2024
@zax71
Copy link
Member

zax71 commented Sep 16, 2024

This is not possible for custom world gens, although it might be possible for vanilla worlds. Will need looking in to

@zax71 zax71 added the State: Open to PR Open to anyone who frees like contributing to MV. label Sep 16, 2024
@FaultyFunctions
Copy link

Any news on this? I'm currently using this plugin: https://www.spigotmc.org/resources/single-biome-worlds%E3%80%8E1-17-1-1-19-3%E3%80%8F.95510/

It would be nice if this was built into Multiverse so we wouldn't need to restart the server every time to generate a single biome world.

@zax71
Copy link
Member

zax71 commented Jan 12, 2025

This has been added in MV5 with /mv create <worldname> normal --biome <biomename> and /mv import <worldname> normal --biome <biomename>

@zax71 zax71 linked a pull request Jan 12, 2025 that will close this issue
75 tasks
@zax71 zax71 added 5.0.0 Next major release. and removed State: Open to PR Open to anyone who frees like contributing to MV. labels Jan 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
5.0.0 Next major release. Type: Idea Suggestion for a new feature or enhancement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants