You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The repository with the C implementation is currently called sarrac. That was the name used for the v2 C package.
The debian amd RPM packages built from it for version 3 are called metpx-sr3c. As part of the build process for RPMS, one must have the directory containing the package match the package name, so need to override the destination on every clone when making RPM packages.
I am wondering if it would be cleaner to rename the package to be metpx-sr3c
Having the name of the C package sarrac be a substring of sarracenia, causes mild confusion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
petersilva
changed the title
should we rename the repostitory from sarrac to metpx-sr3c ?
should we rename the repository from sarrac to metpx-sr3c ?
Dec 18, 2023
The repository with the C implementation is currently called sarrac. That was the name used for the v2 C package.
The debian amd RPM packages built from it for version 3 are called metpx-sr3c. As part of the build process for RPMS, one must have the directory containing the package match the package name, so need to override the destination on every clone when making RPM packages.
I am wondering if it would be cleaner to rename the package to be metpx-sr3c
Having the name of the C package sarrac be a substring of sarracenia, causes mild confusion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: