Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

using read10xMolInfo (v1.14.0 for h5 files from v1.6.1 #81

Open
chensujun opened this issue Nov 9, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

using read10xMolInfo (v1.14.0 for h5 files from v1.6.1 #81

chensujun opened this issue Nov 9, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@chensujun
Copy link

chensujun commented Nov 9, 2021

Hi Aaron,

I was trying to run QC using the latest DropletUtils but the h5 files were generated with older versions of tools and failed to be read in by the newer read10xMolInfo function. Is there a way to deal with it?

Best,
Sujun

@jonathangriffiths
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi Sujun,

Do you mean that the h5 files are from an older version of cellranger?

Jonny

@chensujun
Copy link
Author

Hi Jonny,

Thanks for getting back to me. No it's not from cellranger. The h5 was customized to work with DropletUtils v1.6.1. And problem with the newer version is that it requires 'library_idx', which wasn't there when generating the file.

Best,
Sujun

@jonathangriffiths
Copy link
Collaborator

Are you saying you have customised the h5 file?

You could further customise it to add the library_idx information following the documentation from 10X, here.

@chensujun
Copy link
Author

Thanks Jonny!
Yes someone else customized the h5 file. I was just wondering if there's a way to make the old function compatible with the new version of tools. But you are right, perhaps modify those files is more feasible.

@jonathangriffiths
Copy link
Collaborator

You could try installing an old version of the software!

I haven't followed along with the history of these file formats though, so I'm afraid I can't pinpoint a version for you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants