You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If you tab to focus the map, with scripting enabled, the next tab will take you to the zoom in control, bypassing the <area is="map-area"> elements; if you disable scripting you tab to the area elements in sequence, with the focus indicator showing where you are.
The rendered SVG should essentially be feature links though?
Exactly, but that's not the case, because the map-area code does not use the same implementation as map-feature. I think that maintaining map-area has been mostly overlooked, because we haven't received positive feedback about leveraging the <map> element, quite the opposite, unfortunately.
I've had the impression that talking about <map> has the opposite of the desired effect on old time Web standards folks: they aren't enthusiastic about extending this part of HTML because they don't see the <mapml-viewer> semantics in <map> that I/we do, and they are very very cautious about touching old code that is widely depended upon and could break existing Web sites, maybe not in that order. I might be wrong, but it might be time to retire map-area entirely.
If you tab to focus the map, with scripting enabled, the next tab will take you to the zoom in control, bypassing the <area is="map-area"> elements; if you disable scripting you tab to the area elements in sequence, with the focus indicator showing where you are.
https://maps4html.org/experiments/progressive-enhancement/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: