You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
from @jwalterlarson
Currently the Accumulator works on the assumption of uniform step size in the
accumulation cycle. This has the advantage of supporting a large share of what
is out there. Furthermore, it does this without introducing extra floating
point uncertainty (i.e. dt) in the result.
But, we should start confronting the idea that the averaging cycle might be best
defined in terms of a floating point value (like an hour) and also that we may
wish to start supporting nonumiform step sizes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(copied from MCT's old bugzilla)
from @jwalterlarson
Currently the Accumulator works on the assumption of uniform step size in the
accumulation cycle. This has the advantage of supporting a large share of what
is out there. Furthermore, it does this without introducing extra floating
point uncertainty (i.e. dt) in the result.
But, we should start confronting the idea that the averaging cycle might be best
defined in terms of a floating point value (like an hour) and also that we may
wish to start supporting nonumiform step sizes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: